Skip to main content

It only has to be beautiful enough

It doesn't have to be perfect.

It only has to be beautiful enough.

On a drive home, I realized that things--art, craft, results, don't have to be perfect.  A naive or even inchoate realization, perhaps.  I realized that the motions I go through when I drive are not an artful ballet by far, but they are enough to take me home.  Shifting gears, breaking, judging distances.  All done with relatively little long-term planning.  All done without regard to having to stare at it and fix it up.  All done without a constant drive (excuse the pun) to perfection.  I conduct a series of relatively imprecise physical motions, and the laws of force, momentum, the design and slope of the road, and mechanical elements in my vehicle respond to my orchestra to do the rest.  And the end result is a drive that is at least beautiful enough to take me home.

In fact, a drive that looked too perfect wouldn't even seem as artful.  In the movies nearly missing a turn, turning short, shifting gears at just the right time--right at the brink of failure, are the actions that appear artful to us.
Almost as if just missing it were the epitome of artistry.  A basketball swooshing through a net seems more artful than one bouncing off of the backboard, bouncing on the rim, and going in to score a point.  That same woosh can be heard when the basket is missed entirely and the ball falls short, skidding over the outside of the net.  One swoosh is impressive success, and the other is woeful failure.

And though my drive home isn't nearly as exciting or suave as a speeding hero's in a movie, perhaps it is less exciting precisely because of my broad approximations and safe choices.  Still, both sets of motions arrive at the same end result.  They take me home.

Perfection could be seen as precise geometrical turns, but that would seem to be a technical perfection left in the realm of car commercials.  These perfections might not seem as artistic at all, and when they are, they could be considered an approximation of art.

So much of what we do and what we create is an approximation.  Not an approximation of perfection, but an approximation of a vision.  These approximations seem much more exciting inside narrow windows.  So why in art and in creation should we strive for perfection?  It seems these approximations--these small judgments that add up to resemble an average judgment, a vision or end result--are often much more pleasing than technically perfect execution.

After all, a copy of a recording of a song is an approximation of the sound in a room and that sound is an approximation of an instrument or singer's voice vibrating the molecules in the room.  These vibrations are an approximation of the execution of a series of motions which approximate the musician's intent.  This intent is an approximation of the artists ideas which are often an approximation of the artist's feelings.

There are many approximations along the way, but we can still feel it when an artist "hits it."  And much of this "hitting it," despite levels of technical practice and skill, is due to randomness and luck.  Since these motions are approximations, much of the rest is filled in by our minds.  Connections are made by our minds.  Just as we don't think about every tiny motion of our drive home, we don't think of every tiny molecule, or every tiny vibration of the notes in the music.  We take all of these approximations in and our mind experiences and calculates an average of the whole.

There is a lot of "filling in" and connection-building that our minds do when they experience and absorb something.  Because of this, our motions, our communications, our art, and a great deal of our creations need only be an educated and fortunate approximation of our intent.  And a great deal of these must benefit immensely from the projections, normalizations, extensions, assumptions, and connections made by the world and the mind to "fill in the rest."  Just as the basket, gravity, and force work to translate the approximation of the athletes motions into a game-winning swoosh of the net.

I think it applies to art, life, understanding, communication and creativity.  It doesn't have to be perfect.  It only has to be beautiful enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Beautiful Constraints"

I'm starting to think that programmers who dip into the homebrew, demoscene and retro communities and come out talking about the beauty of programming with constraints are getting it slightly wrong. You want constraints? If you're in a programming or engineering profession, you already have them. Heck, if you're in any profession. But, I know programming/engineering professions best because I've been in them for like 20 years. Your constraints are: Horrible bosses, bad management decisions, a pathological Capitalistic enterprise, idiotic schedules, badly written existing code bases and technical debt, people at higher levels with political control that know a lot less than you, lack of creative or design control, etc. You want constraints? Probably also throw in: Non-existing or ineffective build and test automation, annoying auto-formatters, syntax requirements, unhelpful code reviews and nagging code review requests with people circumventing the tests to get past ...

Automatic Nonsesnsors

Imagine if you and each of your friends wrote random things on index cards all day.  You then made copies of them and whenever you saw your friend or passed by your friend's desk, locker, mailbox, etc. you gave him a copy of the index cards you wrote on that day.  Each friend also gave you a copy of her cards.  After a few exchanges with a few friends, you had a stack of cards to go through, reading each individual card (and they wrote a lot of them).  And, since you wanted people to see your cards, and since trading cards became a social task in itself, you often started trading with just about anybody. Most of the messages were dumb and boring.  In fact, your friends knew that many other people would see these cards, so most were stripped of any kind of controversy or antagonism.  A number of the cards simply said "Here's something I like that I know many other people also like," and then other cards repeated the same thing and had things like, "Yeah!" ...

The End of Story.

This is it.  The end of the movie.  The hero will have to use all of the cliched pithy wisdom that’s been spelled out for him by the older, wiser, less head-strong character who was surprisingly like him in his youth.  Older audience members can relate to both characters, and younger audience members are taxed to consider the wisdom of their elders more often.  All pretty much male-centric; the girl lead who seemed to completely be put off by the male lead has just about completely come around now, after the lull in the middle of the story where the hero’s sensitive side was exposed and he was vulnerable to change.  Finally embracing that change, in the apex of his final challenge, the young hero is compelled to apply the advice that was clearly and consistently broken down for him by the wise old male character and combine it with the sensitivity he’s learned from the female lead.  None of the base-line collateral characters believe in him.  The clear...