Skip to main content

It only has to be beautiful enough

It doesn't have to be perfect.

It only has to be beautiful enough.

On a drive home, I realized that things--art, craft, results, don't have to be perfect.  A naive or even inchoate realization, perhaps.  I realized that the motions I go through when I drive are not an artful ballet by far, but they are enough to take me home.  Shifting gears, breaking, judging distances.  All done with relatively little long-term planning.  All done without regard to having to stare at it and fix it up.  All done without a constant drive (excuse the pun) to perfection.  I conduct a series of relatively imprecise physical motions, and the laws of force, momentum, the design and slope of the road, and mechanical elements in my vehicle respond to my orchestra to do the rest.  And the end result is a drive that is at least beautiful enough to take me home.

In fact, a drive that looked too perfect wouldn't even seem as artful.  In the movies nearly missing a turn, turning short, shifting gears at just the right time--right at the brink of failure, are the actions that appear artful to us.
Almost as if just missing it were the epitome of artistry.  A basketball swooshing through a net seems more artful than one bouncing off of the backboard, bouncing on the rim, and going in to score a point.  That same woosh can be heard when the basket is missed entirely and the ball falls short, skidding over the outside of the net.  One swoosh is impressive success, and the other is woeful failure.

And though my drive home isn't nearly as exciting or suave as a speeding hero's in a movie, perhaps it is less exciting precisely because of my broad approximations and safe choices.  Still, both sets of motions arrive at the same end result.  They take me home.

Perfection could be seen as precise geometrical turns, but that would seem to be a technical perfection left in the realm of car commercials.  These perfections might not seem as artistic at all, and when they are, they could be considered an approximation of art.

So much of what we do and what we create is an approximation.  Not an approximation of perfection, but an approximation of a vision.  These approximations seem much more exciting inside narrow windows.  So why in art and in creation should we strive for perfection?  It seems these approximations--these small judgments that add up to resemble an average judgment, a vision or end result--are often much more pleasing than technically perfect execution.

After all, a copy of a recording of a song is an approximation of the sound in a room and that sound is an approximation of an instrument or singer's voice vibrating the molecules in the room.  These vibrations are an approximation of the execution of a series of motions which approximate the musician's intent.  This intent is an approximation of the artists ideas which are often an approximation of the artist's feelings.

There are many approximations along the way, but we can still feel it when an artist "hits it."  And much of this "hitting it," despite levels of technical practice and skill, is due to randomness and luck.  Since these motions are approximations, much of the rest is filled in by our minds.  Connections are made by our minds.  Just as we don't think about every tiny motion of our drive home, we don't think of every tiny molecule, or every tiny vibration of the notes in the music.  We take all of these approximations in and our mind experiences and calculates an average of the whole.

There is a lot of "filling in" and connection-building that our minds do when they experience and absorb something.  Because of this, our motions, our communications, our art, and a great deal of our creations need only be an educated and fortunate approximation of our intent.  And a great deal of these must benefit immensely from the projections, normalizations, extensions, assumptions, and connections made by the world and the mind to "fill in the rest."  Just as the basket, gravity, and force work to translate the approximation of the athletes motions into a game-winning swoosh of the net.

I think it applies to art, life, understanding, communication and creativity.  It doesn't have to be perfect.  It only has to be beautiful enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Beautiful Constraints"

I'm starting to think that programmers who dip into the homebrew, demoscene and retro communities and come out talking about the beauty of programming with constraints are getting it slightly wrong. You want constraints? If you're in a programming or engineering profession, you already have them. Heck, if you're in any profession. But, I know programming/engineering professions best because I've been in them for like 20 years. Your constraints are: Horrible bosses, bad management decisions, a pathological Capitalistic enterprise, idiotic schedules, badly written existing code bases and technical debt, people at higher levels with political control that know a lot less than you, lack of creative or design control, etc. You want constraints? Probably also throw in: Non-existing or ineffective build and test automation, annoying auto-formatters, syntax requirements, unhelpful code reviews and nagging code review requests with people circumventing the tests to get past ...

Nietzsche was a baller

Hansen Writing Ball This morning I switched on my monitor, noticed the LCD screens of my newly built mechanical keyboard--the Ergodox Infinity--go from "breathe" to a greeting with the qmk logo from its freshly flashed firmware, and then my monitor greeted me with its Emacs session from yesterday. Even though it was not my original intent when switching on and plugging in, I found that I couldn't resist continuing to type up the next logical part of a keymap I started working on for a different mechanical keying device: My long-finished but never customized RAMA m10. Ergodox Infinity (center) RAMA m10 (top right) As I finished joyfully typing the rest of LAYER1, on to LAYER2, it made me think of a story I once read about Nietzsche and his typewriter. I remember the striking thing about it, and probably the reason it occurred to me again in this moment, was how much Nietzsche wrote about using the typewriter and how he thought about how our tools and techni...

Cage of Reason

During the Haitian Revolution against the French, The Haitians sung the soldiers' songs in their language and tense. The soldiers could all see the irony; their own rebel songs, their ideology. We can't invoke this story with our captors, They never heard it. We sacrificed stories for verdicts. We can't invoke the words of the poet. We sacrificed him to the Market. We can’t invoke the wisdom of the old books, We sacrificed them to stammering and doubtful looks. We can't invoke the Church's righteousness or reliance. We sacrificed it to Science. We can’t invoke empathy, We sacrificed it to individual agency. We can’t invoke the deeds of the old King. We sacrificed him to perennial voting. We can't invoke legacy, We sacrificed it to, “Everything I have was earned by me.” We can’t invoke a God’s reprisal. We sacrificed him to blunt denial. We can’t invoke romance. We sacrificed it to an enlightened stance. We can't invoke the r...