Skip to main content

Nietzsche was a baller

Hansen Writing Ball
Hansen Writing Ball
This morning I switched on my monitor, noticed the LCD screens of my newly built mechanical keyboard--the Ergodox Infinity--go from "breathe" to a greeting with the qmk logo from its freshly flashed firmware, and then my monitor greeted me with its Emacs session from yesterday.
https://qmk.fmEven though it was not my original intent when switching on and plugging in, I found that I couldn't resist continuing to type up the next logical part of a keymap I started working on for a different mechanical keying device: My long-finished but never customized RAMA m10.

ergodox infinity and rama m10
Ergodox Infinity (center) RAMA m10 (top right)
As I finished joyfully typing the rest of LAYER1, on to LAYER2, it made me think of a story I once read about Nietzsche and his typewriter. I remember the striking thing about it, and probably the reason it occurred to me again in this moment, was how much Nietzsche wrote about using the typewriter and how he thought about how our tools and techniques affect and influence our art and our work.

Delightfully, a web search turned up several articles about Nietzsche and his new mechanical typing machine. I have some other things to do right now, followed by an appointment, but hopefully I'll come back later and write some more. For now, here are some of the stories and discussions I enjoyed the most so far:
I had forgotten that one of the reasons Nietzsche was so pleased with his mechanical writing tool is that he was suffering from "half blindness" and headaches along with demanding deadlines from publishers. He even said that either writing or reading for 20 minutes or more would cause his hands and head to hurt and his vision to suffer. So, part of it wasn't just the speed at which he could write, but it was almost like a prosthetic: He could produce manuscripts that his editors could read while this could have been difficult or impossible if he had to scrawl it all out by hand. The other subtle point I missed or didn't remember was that while Nietzsche punched on the Hansen Writing Ball he found that he could do it without looking, so without reading and straining his eyes, whereas writing by hand was much more visually demanding.

Comments

  1. Before the event begins the gamers are seated around a desk based mostly on a seat draw. The recreation is then played like normal roulette however with a few twists - in the end the aim is to be the last man standing or have essentially the most amount of chips after the flight/tournament has ended. A recreation of probability by which a small ball is spun on a dishlike system (roulette′ wheel`), with gamers betting on which of the black or red numbered compartments the ball will come to relaxation in. The recreation of American Roulette is played on a wheel which consists of thirty-eight slots, every with its own quantity. The numbers alternate pairs of weird numbers with 1xbet pairs of even numbers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Beautiful Constraints"

I'm starting to think that programmers who dip into the homebrew, demoscene and retro communities and come out talking about the beauty of programming with constraints are getting it slightly wrong. You want constraints? If you're in a programming or engineering profession, you already have them. Heck, if you're in any profession. But, I know programming/engineering professions best because I've been in them for like 20 years. Your constraints are: Horrible bosses, bad management decisions, a pathological Capitalistic enterprise, idiotic schedules, badly written existing code bases and technical debt, people at higher levels with political control that know a lot less than you, lack of creative or design control, etc. You want constraints? Probably also throw in: Non-existing or ineffective build and test automation, annoying auto-formatters, syntax requirements, unhelpful code reviews and nagging code review requests with people circumventing the tests to get past ...

Automatic Nonsesnsors

Imagine if you and each of your friends wrote random things on index cards all day.  You then made copies of them and whenever you saw your friend or passed by your friend's desk, locker, mailbox, etc. you gave him a copy of the index cards you wrote on that day.  Each friend also gave you a copy of her cards.  After a few exchanges with a few friends, you had a stack of cards to go through, reading each individual card (and they wrote a lot of them).  And, since you wanted people to see your cards, and since trading cards became a social task in itself, you often started trading with just about anybody. Most of the messages were dumb and boring.  In fact, your friends knew that many other people would see these cards, so most were stripped of any kind of controversy or antagonism.  A number of the cards simply said "Here's something I like that I know many other people also like," and then other cards repeated the same thing and had things like, "Yeah!" ...

The End of Story.

This is it.  The end of the movie.  The hero will have to use all of the cliched pithy wisdom that’s been spelled out for him by the older, wiser, less head-strong character who was surprisingly like him in his youth.  Older audience members can relate to both characters, and younger audience members are taxed to consider the wisdom of their elders more often.  All pretty much male-centric; the girl lead who seemed to completely be put off by the male lead has just about completely come around now, after the lull in the middle of the story where the hero’s sensitive side was exposed and he was vulnerable to change.  Finally embracing that change, in the apex of his final challenge, the young hero is compelled to apply the advice that was clearly and consistently broken down for him by the wise old male character and combine it with the sensitivity he’s learned from the female lead.  None of the base-line collateral characters believe in him.  The clear...